Recently, most company start use >=2.6.31 kernels to replace redhat kernels. But the config "Filter access to /dev/mem" is "default n", that allows kernel rootkit using /dev/mem again. it could access all kernel memory default. Most administrator don't known the "Filter access to /dev/mem" is "defult N", when he compiles the kernel, it's easily to be attacked by rootkit. Signed-off-by: Zhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt@alibaba-inc.com> --- arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 3 ++- arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig | 2 +- arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug index bc01e3e..733aea6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ source "lib/Kconfig.debug" config STRICT_DEVMEM bool "Filter access to /dev/mem" + default y ---help--- If this option is disabled, you allow userspace (root) access to all of memory, including kernel and userspace memory. Accidental @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ config STRICT_DEVMEM This is sufficient for dosemu and X and all common users of /dev/mem. - If in doubt, say Y. + If in doubt, say N. config X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP bool "Enable verbose x86 bootup info messages" diff --git a/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig b/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig index d28fad1..95c85a8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig +++ b/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig @@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ CONFIG_PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT=y # CONFIG_SAMPLES is not set CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KGDB=y # CONFIG_KGDB is not set -# CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is not set +CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=y CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP=y CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP=y diff --git a/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig b/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig index 6c86acd..659bfe7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig +++ b/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig @@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ ...
Have you ever successfully attack by this way? If CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM --
[root@localhost zealot]# ./zealot
[+] Found HISTSIZE. [SAFE]
[+] Check md5 values. [SAFE]
[+] eth0 was not set promsic. [SAFE]
[+] Not found raw socket. [SAFE]
system_call addr changed to 0xc04028a0,sys_call_table addr changed to
0xc0675130,Found dr rootkit!,system call sys_execve addr changed to
0xc0401582,system call sys_olduname addr changed to 0xc0405989,system
call sys_fork addr changed to 0xc0407bbb
It's a host ids i wrote, it could search all kernel memory using /dev/mem. ok?
some of the code here:
static void *kmap(unsigned long off, unsigned long count)
{
int fd;
void *p;
fd = open(DEV_MEM, O_RDWR);
if (fd < 3) {
DbgPrint("open %s failed.\n", DEV_MEM);
dup2(fd, 3);
close(fd);
fd = 3;
}
p = mmap(NULL, ALIGNUP(count + 4097), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, fd, ALIGNDOWN(off) & 0x0fffffff);
if (p == MAP_FAILED)
{
mem_support_flag = 1;
fprintf(stdout, "[-] /dev/mem cannot be read or write.\n");
DbgPrint("mmap failture, errno %d\n", errno);
close(fd);
return NULL;
}
close(fd);
return p;
--
Years ago, someone sent the same patch. --
thanks, i read it. But nowadays >= 2.6.26 kernel became more popular, more people start use it. When they compile the kernel, they don't change KERNEL_HACKING option, becasue they are not kernel prgramer. --
mmap_mem in drivers/char/mem.c
if (!range_is_allowed(vma->vm_pgoff, size))
return -EPERM;
if (!phys_mem_access_prot_allowed(file, vma->vm_pgoff, size,
&vma->vm_page_prot))
return -EINVAL;
If kernel is not set CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM, range_is_allowed will
return 1 always, and phys_mem_access_prot_allowed is defined as weak.
In arch/x86/mm/pat.c, phys_mem_access_prot_allowed is defined, and
range_is_allowed is declared to check the mem access w/o
CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM, so it looks like the same as kernel w/
CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM.
What's the result for kernel w/ CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM ? does it prevent
--
> I'm curious about the result if you open this option to yes. here is the result you want see: Program zealot tried to access /dev/mem between 407000->409000. my program is not a rootkit, if you want to see some backdoors, please read the Mood-nt2.3 or suckit source code, have fun. --
If that option doesn't add any protection, what's it good for?
Access to /dev/mem being filtered in PAT obviously applies only to x86. Architectures which don't do such filtering in their respective phys_mem_access_prot_allowed() still need this option. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. --
So why not use it for all archs uniformly? Is PAT filtering better in some ways? Michal Svoboda
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:41:53 +0200 PAT is an x86 specific hardware feature. The x86 processors can set per page caching properties as with some other CPU designs. In the x86 case all references to the page must have the same cache settings so the PAT implementation has to filter /dev/mem access to avoid machine check errors. It's not implemented as a security feature, its a side effect of the hardware requirements on that CPU range. Alan --
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:36:26 +0200 PAT is x86 specific --
Eek. So... what is it? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html --
