penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp wrote:
quoted text
> Sean Hefty wrote:
>> Sean and Roland, is below patch correct?
>>> inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset.
>> It looks correct to me.  I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out
>> the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes
>> worked fine for me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
>>
> Thank you for testing.
> 
> I think it is better to split this patch into
> 
> Part 1: Make cma_alloc_any_port() to use cma_alloc_port().
> 
> Part 2: Insert "!inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover) &&" line.
> 
> for future "git bisect".
> 

Right, thanks a lot for your work!

So, I will rebase my patch 3/3 on top of this patch. I hope someone
could take this one asap.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/