Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: Userspace support for MMU notifications

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Håkon Bugge
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 - 1:29 am

On Apr 13, 2010, at 1:59 , Jason Gunthorpe wrote:


I am not sure I agree with the premises here. ptMalloc and malloc hooks are not related to the issue in my opinion. User space library calls do not change virtual to physical mapping, system calls do. The following sys calls might change virtual to physical mapping: munmap(), mremap(), sbrk(), madvice(). What we need is glibc to provide hooks for these 4 sys calls and the general syscall() when its argument is one of the four mentioned syscalls. To me, that is what is needed, and the ummunotify direction seems way too complicated to me.

It is further claimed that "… other tricks are not robust". I wrote the code used in Scali/Platform MPI handling the issue. I do not think its fair to claim that this MPI  is not robust in this matter nor that is performance is bad.


Thanks, Håkon


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: Userspace support for MMU notifica ..., Håkon Bugge, (Tue Apr 13, 1:29 am)
[PATCH] ummunotify: fix umn-test build, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Apr 14, 9:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: fix umn-test build, Eric B Munson, (Sat Apr 17, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: fix umn-test build, Roland Dreier, (Sun Apr 18, 7:38 am)