On Monday 12 April 2010 22:32:33 Mike Christie wrote:
quoted text
> On 04/12/2010 09:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> + * Helper routiners to check to determine if the entry is valid
> >> + * in the proper iBFT structure.
> >> + */
> >> +static mode_t ibft_check_nic_for(void *data, int type)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ibft_kobject *entry = data;
> >> +	struct ibft_nic *nic = entry->nic;
> >> +	mode_t rc = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (type) {
> >> +	case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_INDEX:
> >> +	case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_FLAGS:
> >> +		rc = 1;
> >
> > Did you mean for that value?
> >
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_IP_ADDR:
> >> +		if (memcmp(nic->ip_addr, nulls, sizeof(nic->ip_addr)))
> >> +			rc = S_IRUGO;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_SUBNET_MASK:
> >> +		if (nic->subnet_mask_prefix)
> >> +			rc = S_IRUGO;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_ORIGIN:
> >> +		rc = 1;
> >
> > and this one as well?
>
> I did not. They should be S_IRUGO. Do you want me to resubmit the
> patches or are you just going to edit those two lines if you merge them?

No need to resend them (unless Peter eyes found something I missed).
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/