Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Stern
Date: Monday, April 12, 2010 - 9:57 am

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:


Indeed, something must go wrong somewhere.  Since Daniel's patch fixed
the problem by changing the buffer from a streaming mapping to a
coherent mapping, it's logical to assume that bad DMA addresses have
something to do with it.  But we don't really know for certain.

Alan Stern

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Alan Stern, (Mon Apr 12, 9:57 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Daniel Mack, (Mon Apr 12, 10:15 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 12, 10:22 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit sy ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Mon Apr 12, 10:52 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Daniel Mack, (Mon Apr 12, 10:56 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Daniel Mack, (Tue Apr 13, 11:22 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Pedro Ribeiro, (Tue Apr 13, 4:46 pm)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Daniel Mack, (Wed Apr 14, 3:09 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Pedro Ribeiro, (Wed Apr 14, 3:47 am)
Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems, Pedro Ribeiro, (Wed Apr 14, 4:02 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit sy ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Wed Apr 14, 6:18 am)