Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Theodore Tso
Date: Monday, April 12, 2010 - 5:48 am

On Apr 11, 2010, at 10:56 PM, rdunlap@xenotime.net wrote:

I have a standard local patch that I've been carrying for I-don't-know-how-long which just nukes the "-dirty" suffix, which I needed because make-kpkg modifies some kernel build files, so the version string would always have 
-dirty.

It's not hard to fix...

-- Ted

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Pavel Machek, (Sun Apr 11, 9:47 am)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Apr 11, 11:58 am)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Pavel Machek, (Sun Apr 11, 1:14 pm)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Apr 11, 3:24 pm)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, rdunlap, (Sun Apr 11, 6:20 pm)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, rdunlap, (Sun Apr 11, 7:56 pm)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Randy Dunlap, (Sun Apr 11, 8:49 pm)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Theodore Tso, (Mon Apr 12, 5:48 am)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Pavel Machek, (Mon Apr 12, 6:14 am)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Apr 12, 10:03 am)
Re: LOCALVERSION_AUTO considered harmful, Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Apr 12, 11:51 am)