Cong Wang wrote:
quoted text
> Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >> Index: linux-2.6/net/sctp/socket.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/net/sctp/socket.c
> >> +++ linux-2.6/net/sctp/socket.c
> >> @@ -5436,6 +5436,8 @@ static long sctp_get_port_local(struct s
> >>  			rover++;
> >>  			if ((rover < low) || (rover > high))
> >>  				rover = low;
> >> +			if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover))
> >> +				continue;
> > 
> > This one needs to be
> > 
> > 			if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover))
> > 				goto next_nolock;
> > 
> >>  			index = sctp_phashfn(rover);
> >>  			head = &sctp_port_hashtable[index];
> >>  			sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> > 
> >  next:
> > 			sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> > +next_nolock:
> > 		} while (--remaining > 0);
> > 
> > otherwise, it will loop forever if all ports were reserved.
> 
> Sorry, doesn't 'continue' jump to exactly where 'next_nolock' is??
> Or I am missing something?

My misreading, sorry.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/