> Hi,
>
> This patchset drops any use of the big kernel lock from procfs.
> May be there is still one or two NULL llseek somewhere but I
> think we have fixed 99% of those that were in the procfs core.
>
> Users of procfs implementing an ioctl have not been easy to
> spot automatically (there are hundreds of procfs users)
> as there are many indirect ways to register a procfs, depending
> on the subsystem you are.
>
> So for those who want to verify the reliability of this check,
> you can look at the script there:
>
>
http://tglx.de/~fweisbec/seek.py
>
> Beware it's very dirty! The hardcoded path are those I had
> to check manually (or that I added to the automatic check).
> One day I should learn how to use Coccinelle instead.
>
> In the worst case, the remaining ones this script or my eyes
> forgot will trigger a warning.
>
> Thanks.