No, it traces back to a call to lock_tx_qs() which is a spinlock in
mainline and gets converted to a "sleeping" spinlock in -RT. That
means it can't be called with interrupts disabled. But the code in
adjust_link does exaclty that.
Does the patch below fix it ?
Thanks,
tglx
---
Subject: net-gianfar-fix-rt-splat.patch
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:20:57 +0200
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/drivers/net/gianfar.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ static void adjust_link(struct net_devic
struct phy_device *phydev = priv->phydev;
int new_state = 0;
- local_irq_save(flags);
+ local_irq_save_nort(flags);
lock_tx_qs(priv);
if (phydev->link) {
@@ -2785,7 +2785,7 @@ static void adjust_link(struct net_devic
if (new_state && netif_msg_link(priv))
phy_print_status(phydev);
unlock_tx_qs(priv);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ local_irq_restore_nort(flags);
}
/* Update the hash table based on the current list of multicast
--
That fixed it. Thanks! However I'm seeing two more similar rtmutex:684 BUGs from dmesg now, they're from my own drivers and I'm tracking them down. Xianghua --
Here is the new dmesg output: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:684 pcnt: 1 0 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 5770, name: insmod Call Trace: [ce935dc0] [c00096cc] show_stack+0x6c/0x1a4 (unreliable) [ce935df0] [c001f928] __might_sleep+0x104/0x108 [ce935e00] [c03cb414] rt_spin_lock+0xa0/0xa4 [ce935e10] [c00a4098] kmem_cache_alloc+0x50/0x17c [ce935e40] [c0073570] irq_to_desc_alloc_node+0x104/0x5ec [ce935e60] [c00064e0] irq_setup_virq+0x30/0xa8 [ce935e80] [c000665c] irq_create_mapping+0x104/0x168 [ce935ea0] [d1f69bc4] dma_init+0x118/0x1f0 [ipc] [ce935ee0] [d1f75018] ipc_init+0x18/0x140 [ipc] [ce935ef0] [c00038e0] do_one_initcall+0x54/0x210 [ce935f20] [c005e424] sys_init_module+0x120/0x240 [ce935f40] [c00139d4] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38 I chased from ipc_init to irq_to_desc_alloc_node and found no interrupt-disabling. By looking at irq_to_desc_alloc_node (kernel/irq/handler.c) it has raw_spin_lock_irqsave(), with this raw spinlock irqsave I'm not sure if it causes trouble at kmem_cache_alloc after rt11 is applied, still checking on that. thanks, xianghua --
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Xianghua Xiao wrote: Can you please disabled CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ ? Thanks, tglx --
After disabled CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ the BUG output disappeared. Thanks a lot! Xianghua --
