Re: [COUNTERPATCH] mm: avoid overflowing preempt_count() in mmu_take_all_locks()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010 - 9:15 am

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 07:06:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:

I believe that Peter is referring to the RCU implementation you get
with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which currently depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT.
The other implementation is CONFIG_TREE_RCU, which is usually called
"classic RCU".

							Thanx, Paul
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [COUNTERPATCH] mm: avoid overflowing preempt_count() i ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Apr 1, 9:15 am)