On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:37:51 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:57 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 
> > The question still remains what the incremental cost is of doing
> > irqsave/irqrestore. 
> 
> The only other option is to have local_irq_enable() check a global
> (system_state ?) before enabling. Almost as gross ...
> 

Add an irq-disable-depth counter to the task_struct, fix all the bugs
which that exposes..

But these things are all utterly gross.  The bottom line is that
radix_tree_init() is manifestly unsuited to being called with local
interrupts disabled.  773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 was just
a wrong patch.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/