Re: pr_* versus dev_*

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Neshama Parhoti
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 10:42 pm

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:

thank you.

so i should use whatever print call that adds most information right ?

even if that means that some part of the driver uses pr_* and some
part of the driver use dev_* ?

thank you again
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
pr_* versus dev_*, Neshama Parhoti, (Tue Mar 30, 9:07 am)
Re: pr_* versus dev_*, Joe Perches, (Tue Mar 30, 9:52 am)
Re: pr_* versus dev_*, Neshama Parhoti, (Tue Mar 30, 10:42 pm)
Re: pr_* versus dev_*, Joe Perches, (Tue Mar 30, 10:48 pm)
Re: pr_* versus dev_*, Neshama Parhoti, (Tue Mar 30, 10:57 pm)