[PATCH -mm] proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 10:43 am

->siglock is no longer needed to access task->signal, change
oom_adjust_read() and oom_adjust_write() to read/write oom_adj
lockless.

Yes, this means that "echo 2 >oom_adj" and "echo 1 >oom_adj"
can race and the second write can win, but I hope this is OK.

Also, cleanup the EACCES case a bit.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---

 fs/proc/base.c |   28 ++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- 34-rc1/fs/proc/base.c~PROC_5_OOM_ADJ	2010-03-30 18:23:50.000000000 +0200
+++ 34-rc1/fs/proc/base.c	2010-03-30 19:14:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -981,22 +981,16 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_read(struct fi
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
 	char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
+	int oom_adjust;
 	size_t len;
-	int oom_adjust = OOM_DISABLE;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!task)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
-	if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
-		oom_adjust = task->signal->oom_adj;
-		unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
-	}
-
+	oom_adjust = task->signal->oom_adj;
 	put_task_struct(task);
 
 	len = snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), "%i\n", oom_adjust);
-
 	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len);
 }
 
@@ -1006,7 +1000,6 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_write(struct f
 	struct task_struct *task;
 	char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
 	long oom_adjust;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int err;
 
 	memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
@@ -1025,20 +1018,11 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_write(struct f
 	task = get_proc_task(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
 	if (!task)
 		return -ESRCH;
-	if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
-		put_task_struct(task);
-		return -ESRCH;
-	}
-
-	if (oom_adjust < task->signal->oom_adj && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
-		unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
-		put_task_struct(task);
-		return -EACCES;
-	}
 
-	task->signal->oom_adj = oom_adjust;
-
-	unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
+	if (task->signal->oom_adj <= oom_adjust || capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+		task->signal->oom_adj = oom_adjust;
+	else
+		count = -EACCES;
 	put_task_struct(task);
 
 	return count;

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Anfei Zhou, (Wed Mar 24, 9:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Mar 24, 7:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 26, 3:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Oleg Nesterov, (Fri Mar 26, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Sat Mar 27, 7:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Oleg Nesterov, (Sun Mar 28, 9:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Sun Mar 28, 2:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Oleg Nesterov, (Mon Mar 29, 4:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Oleg Nesterov, (Mon Mar 29, 4:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Mon Mar 29, 1:01 pm)
[PATCH -mm] proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj, Oleg Nesterov, (Tue Mar 30, 10:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Tue Mar 30, 1:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Mar 30, 5:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Tue Mar 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Mar 30, 11:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Balbir Singh, (Tue Mar 30, 11:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Mar 30, 11:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Tue Mar 30, 11:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Wed Mar 31, 12:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Mel Gorman, (Fri Apr 2, 3:17 am)
[PATCH -mm 0/4] oom: linux has threads, Oleg Nesterov, (Fri Apr 2, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Sun Apr 4, 4:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, Mel Gorman, (Mon Apr 5, 3:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop, David Rientjes, (Tue Apr 6, 3:40 pm)