No, I did not want to give that impression. But my rational was, that if this is
really a warning that has no meaning on X86, then why should it stay in code
that is x86 only. And then why should that not go upstream.
When I tried following the code, it looked like this was carried forward for
quite a while and maybe it just stayed because nobody noticed it.
But with KVM using that scsi driver, other distros might see the same bogus
warning and then it would be beneficial for all to just remove it.
If Ingo or hpa say it is needed, ok. But its at least worth a go.
-Stefan
--