Re: Is module refcounting racy?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Monday, March 29, 2010 - 2:12 am

On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:25:34 pm Nick Piggin wrote:

Other than for advisory purposes, the refcount is only checked against zero
under stop_machine.  For exactly this reason.

Hope that helps,
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Is module refcounting racy?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 18, 3:55 am)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Rusty Russell, (Mon Mar 29, 2:12 am)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Nick Piggin, (Mon Mar 29, 9:58 am)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Rusty Russell, (Tue Mar 30, 8:44 pm)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Apr 1, 1:09 am)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 1, 8:55 am)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Rusty Russell, (Mon Apr 5, 7:39 pm)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Nick Piggin, (Mon Apr 5, 10:05 pm)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Apr 5, 11:19 pm)
Re: Is module refcounting racy?, Nick Piggin, (Tue Apr 6, 12:38 am)