Re: [PATCH] Fix __vmalloc(), etc on MIPS for non-GPL modules

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Anton Altaparmakov
Date: Friday, March 26, 2010 - 8:01 am

Hi Ralf,

On 26 Mar 2010, at 14:52, Ralf Baechle wrote:

Yes.  (-:

Embedded companies tend to use very old kernels.  Usually 2.6.10-2.6.18 range.  This is the fist time someone using MIPS architecture came up with a 2.6.27 kernel and linking failed hence my patch.  I only personally test compilation across all kernels (2.6.10-latest) on x86 so I miss things like that happening...


Sorry about that!!!  I sent the patch using Pine and thought I was safe on that front but I probably did something wrong.  )))-:


Great, thanks!

Best regards,

	Anton


-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Fix __vmalloc(), etc on MIPS for non-GPL modules, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 25, 1:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Fix __vmalloc(), etc on MIPS for non-GPL modules, Anton Altaparmakov, (Fri Mar 26, 8:01 am)