Re: set_cpus_allowed_ptr

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Julia Lawall
Date: Friday, March 26, 2010 - 4:22 am

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:


Perhaps a subtlety is that set_cpus_allowed is creating a new variable, 
whose address it sends to set_cpus_allowed_ptr?

julia
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
set_cpus_allowed_ptr, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Mar 26, 3:03 am)
Re: set_cpus_allowed_ptr, Julia Lawall, (Fri Mar 26, 4:22 am)
Re: set_cpus_allowed_ptr, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Mar 26, 4:52 am)
Re: set_cpus_allowed_ptr, Julia Lawall, (Fri Mar 26, 9:38 am)