Hi Dan,

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:35:21PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Richard Röjfors
> <richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com> wrote:
> > To follow are two patches.
> >
> > Samuel and Dan, since the MFD patch relies on the DMA patch.
> > The MFD patch is against Samuels next tree, maybe it is easiest
> > if the DMA driver is merged via Samuels tree?
> 
> It depends on the mfd patch at runtime, but thankfully not at build
> time.  There are some other patches being floated by Linus to change
> the device_terminate_all() and device_is_tx_complete() operations.
> So, I want to take just the driver patch through the dma tree to make
> sure everything stays in sync.
Makes sense. I'll take the MFD patch, thanks for taking care of the dma one.

Cheers,
Samuel.


quoted text
> Thanks,
> Dan

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/