login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
March
»
24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Lameter
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 - 12:16 pm
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted text
> I discovered that we can overflow stack if CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y and use > slabs with many objects, since list_slab_objects() and process_slab() > use DECLARE_BITMAP(map, page->objects);
Maybe we better allocate the bitmap via kmalloc then. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Eric Dumazet
, (Wed Mar 24, 4:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Mar 24, 12:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Eric Dumazet
, (Wed Mar 24, 12:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Mar 24, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Eric Dumazet
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Eric Dumazet
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Eric Dumazet
, (Wed Mar 24, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Pekka Enberg
, (Thu Mar 25, 12:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Mar 25, 2:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Potential stack overflow
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sun Mar 28, 10:10 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
FUJITA Tomonori
Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Jens Axboe
Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Regression from 2.6.24-rc1-git1 softlockup while bo...
Ingo Molnar
Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] sched: automated per tty task groups
Ingo Molnar
Re: [GIT PULL] time.c - respin
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: Reporting bugs and bisection (was: Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors)
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Michal Sojka
[PATCHv5 1/2] filter-branch: Fix to allow replacing submodules with another content
Junio C Hamano
Re: Fwd: git status options feature suggestion
A Large Angry SCM
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Stefan Richter
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
linux-netdev
:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Re: [PATCH 06/37] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 1/5] dccp: Initialisation framework for feature negotiation
Ursula Braun
[patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: S3C64XX: DMA: Callback with correct buffer pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sata_mv: drop unncessary EH callback resetting
Linux Kernel Mailing List
libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5905/1: ARM: Global ASID allocation on SMP
Linux Kernel Mailing List
timer: Try to survive timer callback preempt_count leak
openbsd-misc
:
Rene Maroufi
smtpd: Aliases only work with for local alias aliases
Stephen J. Bevan
GRE over IPsec
Darrin Chandler
Re: strange output on openbsd C code
Nick Holland
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Stéphane Chausson
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate