Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
quoted text > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug,
>> so -stable would be nice.
>
> Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was
> included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix
> breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system").
It would be also nice to get that change into 2.6.32 stable. That is
widely used on larger systems.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 hu ... , Andi Kleen , (Tue Mar 23, 7:15 pm)
