On 03/22/2010 10:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On 03/22/2010 02:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>      
>>>> Transitive had a product that was using a KVM context to run their
>>>> binary translator which allowed them full access to the host
>>>> processes virtual address space range.  In this case, there is no
>>>> kernel and there are no devices.
>>>>          
>>> And your point is that such vcpus should be excluded from profiling just
>>> because they fall outside the Qemu/libvirt umbrella?
>>>        
>> You don't instrument it the way you'd instrument an operating system so no,
>> you don't want it to show up in perf kvm top.
>>      
> Erm, why not? It's executing a virtualized CPU, so sure it makes sense to
> allow the profiling of it!
>    

It may not make sense to have symbol tables for it, for example it isn't 
generated from source code but from binary code for another architecture.

Of course, just showing addresses is fine, but you don't need qemu for that.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/