Re: [PATCH 2/5] jump label: base patch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Monday, March 22, 2010 - 1:04 pm

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 12:07 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:

I'm curious to how long this takes with a few hundred trace points
(which we currently have). Perhaps this could be sorted at compile time?


I see duplicate code here for hashing.

Why not:

	e = get_jump_label_entry(name);
	if (e)
		return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);

?


Non static function without kernel documentation. 

-- Steve




--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/5] jump label v5, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 9:07 am)
[PATCH 2/5] jump label: base patch, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 9:07 am)
[PATCH 3/5] jump label: x86 support, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 9:07 am)
[PATCH 4/5] jump label: tracepoint support, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 9:07 am)
[PATCH 5/5] jump label: add module support, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 9:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/5] jump label: x86 support, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Mar 22, 9:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] jump label: tracepoint support, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Mar 22, 9:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] jump label: base patch, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Mar 22, 1:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/5] jump label: x86 support, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] jump label: tracepoint support, Jason Baron, (Mon Mar 22, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] jump label: base patch, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 22, 2:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] jump label: base patch, Masami Hiramatsu, (Fri Mar 26, 2:30 pm)