On 03/22/2010 07:52 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Avi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
>    
>>> It's kinda funny to see people argue that having an external
>>> repository is not a problem and that it's not a big deal if building
>>> something from the repository is slightly painful as long as it
>>> doesn't require a PhD when we have _real world_ experience that it
>>> _does_ limit developer base in some cases. Whether or not that applies
>>> to kvm remains to be seen but I've yet to see a convincing argument
>>> why it doesn't.
>>>        
>> qemu has non-Linux developers.  Not all of their contributions are relevant
>> to kvm but some are.  If we pull qemu into tools/kvm, we lose them.
>>      
> Yeah, you probably would but the hypothesis is that you'd end up with
> a bigger net developer base for the _Linux_ version. Now you might not
> think that's important but I certainly do and I think Ingo does as
> well. ;-)
>    

You're probably correct, but the point is that non-Linux developers also 
contribute things which kvm benefits from.  Not a whole lot, but some.

quoted text
> That said, pulling 400 KLOC of code into the kernel sounds really
> excessive. Would we need all that if we just do native virtualization
> and no actual emulation?
>    

What is native virtualization and no actual emulation?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/