Re: yaffs2 NAND fs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2010 - 6:51 am

On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Peter Paul wrote:

I would guess it's a combination of multiple reasons:

1. It has not been submitted for upstream inclusion, at least not
   during the last few years.
2. We don't have a staging area like drivers/staging for file systems
   in the way that we have for drivers
3. There is now ubifs and (soon) logfs upstream, both of which appear
   to be superior to yaffs in many ways.

	Arnd
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
yaffs2 NAND fs, Peter Paul, (Mon Mar 1, 10:05 pm)
Re: yaffs2 NAND fs, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Mar 2, 6:51 am)
Re: yaffs2 NAND fs, Maxin John, (Wed Mar 3, 8:09 am)
Re: yaffs2 NAND fs, Mike Frysinger, (Wed Mar 3, 5:20 pm)