login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
March
»
19
Re: Kernel vs user memory
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [author]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Siddhartha Chhabra
Subject:
Re: Kernel vs user memory
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 6:29 pm
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text
> > That is correct. The kernel can avoid a PF if it wants to by ensuring > the page tables are set up properly from the start; and physical > addresses below a certain value (which varies by architecture) can be > accessed directly without any setup at all. >
Thank you for your time, this discussion was really helpful. Thanks once again Sid --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [author]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Kernel vs user memory
, sidc7
, (Fri Jan 16, 7:56 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, Bryan Donlan
, (Fri Jan 16, 9:16 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, sidc7
, (Fri Jan 16, 9:21 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, Bryan Donlan
, (Fri Jan 16, 10:26 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Fri Jan 16, 11:26 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, sidc7
, (Fri Jan 16, 11:34 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Fri Jan 16, 11:38 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, sidc7
, (Fri Jan 16, 11:42 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Sat Jan 17, 12:27 am)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, sidc7
, (Mon Jan 19, 1:03 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, Bryan Donlan
, (Thu Mar 18, 5:28 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, Bryan Donlan
, (Thu Mar 18, 6:06 pm)
Re: Kernel vs user memory
, Siddhartha Chhabra
, (Thu Mar 18, 6:29 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ingo Molnar
Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
Vivek Goyal
[PATCH] x86_64: Display more intutive error message if kernel is not 2MB aligned
Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [0/35] Some x86 2.6.22 candidate patches for review
Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Marker probes in futex.c
git
:
Felipe Contreras
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix install-doc-quick target
Nicolas Pitre
Re: About git and the use of SHA-1
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh: Fix compile error by operands(mov.l) in sh3/entry.S
Linux Kernel Mailing List
New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/kexec: Add support for FSL-BookE
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] 5388/1: Add hwcap bits for VFPv3 and VFPv3D16
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
linux-netdev
:
David Dillow
Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Introduce hlist_nulls variant of hlist
Russell King
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
David Miller
Re: mac80211 truesize bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Andres Salazar
About priorities in /etc/resolv.conf
Rob Shepherd
x86 hardware for router system
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Mitja Muženič
Re: isakmpd -- NCP IPsec client: peer proposed invalid phase 2 IDs
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate