login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
March
»
19
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Jamie Lokier
Subject:
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 6:22 pm
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 12:03 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > > Sorry in and long are compatible in 32-bit but not long long. > > > > int and long are not compatible in 64-bit > > > > It is hard the keep all the nodes and arguments straight. > > > > But the concern about changing the prototype and are people actually > > using the prototype are still valid. > > Well, using the macro trick instead would fix that problem, code > wouldn't build if it doesn't include unistd.h :-)
Or it will build, but call the old ABI version - no change to those programs. -- Jamie --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Sun Mar 14, 9:48 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, David Miller
, (Sun Mar 14, 10:06 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Sun Mar 14, 10:18 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, David Miller
, (Sun Mar 14, 10:54 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Ralf Baechle
, (Mon Mar 15, 6:44 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Steven Munroe
, (Mon Mar 15, 8:03 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Jamie Lokier
, (Mon Mar 15, 8:04 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Mar 15, 8:13 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Ulrich Drepper
, (Mon Mar 15, 9:00 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, David Miller
, (Mon Mar 15, 12:00 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Mar 15, 12:41 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:22 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:27 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:32 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:33 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Mar 15, 1:41 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Steven Munroe
, (Tue Mar 16, 2:56 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Tue Mar 16, 5:31 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Ulrich Drepper
, (Tue Mar 16, 10:52 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Wed Mar 17, 1:56 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Ulrich Drepper
, (Wed Mar 17, 2:14 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Jamie Lokier
, (Wed Mar 17, 2:18 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Wed Mar 17, 3:13 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Wed Mar 17, 3:18 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Mar 17, 11:30 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Wed Mar 17, 1:35 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Mar 17, 1:53 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Wed Mar 17, 3:58 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Steven Munroe
, (Thu Mar 18, 9:08 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Andreas Schwab
, (Thu Mar 18, 9:21 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Steven Munroe
, (Thu Mar 18, 10:03 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Thu Mar 18, 2:18 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
, Jamie Lokier
, (Thu Mar 18, 6:22 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Rusty Russell
Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
Bill Fink
Re: [PATCH] net: add ability to clear stats via ethtool - e1000/pcnet32
Jeffrey V. Merkey
Re: Versioning file system
Alexey Dobriyan
Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
Luben Tuikov
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB: tm6000: add special usb request to quit i2c tuner transfer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
OMAP: DSS2: SDI driver
Linux Kernel Mailing List
PCI: introduce pci_pcie_cap()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
PCI hotplug: acpiphp: remove superfluous _HPP/_HPX evaluation
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [2.6.30-rc3] powerpc: compilation error of mace module
Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [PATCH] igb: fix kexec with igb
Patrick McHardy
Re: [rfc 02/13] [RFC 02/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Add callid parser
webmaster Maintenance
联系系统管理员
Krzysztof Oledzki
Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".
openbsd-misc
:
Ted Bullock
Re: Proliant DL380 G3 cannot get on network
Jack J. Woehr
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
Úlfar M. E. Johnson
installing openbsd in xen
Eric Furman
Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
Tony Abernethy
Re: The Atheros story in much fewer words
git
:
Oliver Kullmann
Re: how to move with history?
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/3] git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing
Shawn O. Pearce
Re: Bugs in Gitosis
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
David Kastrup
Re: I'm a total push-over..
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate