Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » March » 18

Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Subject: Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 2:18 pm

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 12:03 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:

Well, using the macro trick instead would fix that problem, code
wouldn't build if it doesn't include unistd.h :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Mar 14, 9:48 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), David Miller, (Sun Mar 14, 10:06 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Mar 14, 10:18 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), David Miller, (Sun Mar 14, 10:54 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Ralf Baechle, (Mon Mar 15, 6:44 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Steven Munroe, (Mon Mar 15, 8:03 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Jamie Lokier, (Mon Mar 15, 8:04 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Mar 15, 8:13 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Ulrich Drepper, (Mon Mar 15, 9:00 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), David Miller, (Mon Mar 15, 12:00 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Mar 15, 12:41 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Mar 15, 1:22 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Mar 15, 1:27 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Mar 15, 1:32 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Mar 15, 1:33 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Mar 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Mar 15, 1:41 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Steven Munroe, (Tue Mar 16, 2:56 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 16, 5:31 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Ulrich Drepper, (Tue Mar 16, 10:52 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 17, 1:56 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Mar 17, 2:14 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Jamie Lokier, (Wed Mar 17, 2:18 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 17, 3:13 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 17, 3:18 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Mar 17, 11:30 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 17, 1:35 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Mar 17, 1:53 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 17, 3:58 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Steven Munroe, (Thu Mar 18, 9:08 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Andreas Schwab, (Thu Mar 18, 9:21 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Steven Munroe, (Thu Mar 18, 10:03 am)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Thu Mar 18, 2:18 pm)
Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall(), Jamie Lokier, (Thu Mar 18, 6:22 pm)