You can't be serious. I find that the difficulty in contributing a
patch has mostly to do with writing the patch, and less with figuring
out which email address to send it to.
Indeed, working simultaneously on two different projects is difficult.
I usually work for a while on one, and then 'cd', physically and
psychically, to the other. Then switch back. Sort of like the
scheduler on a uniprocessor machine.
We have a large number of such stupid, fanatic, desperate developers in
the qemu and kvm communities.
By "serious developer" I mean
- someone who is interested in contributing, not in getting their name
into the kernel commits list
- someone who is willing to read the wiki page and find out where the
repository and mailing list for a project is
- someone who will spend enough time on the project so that the time
to clone two repositories will not be a factor in their contributions
- someone who will work on the uncool stuff like fixing bugs and
providing interfaces to other tools
Let's wait and see then. If the tools/perf/ experience has really good
results, we can reconsider this at a later date.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--