On 03/17/2010 02:41 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
quoted text
> Hi -
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 06:04:10PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>    
>> [...]
>> The only way to really address this is to change the interaction.
>> Instead of running perf externally to qemu, we should support a perf
>> command in the qemu monitor that can then tie directly to the perf
>> tooling.  That gives us the best possible user experience.
>>      
> To what extent could this be solved with less crossing of
> isolation/abstraction layers, if the perfctr facilities were properly
> virtualized?
>    

That's the more interesting (by far) usage model.  In general guest 
owners don't have access to the host, and host owners can't (and 
shouldn't) change guests.

Monitoring guests from the host is useful for kvm developers, but less 
so for users.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/