Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chase Douglas
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 7:50 pm

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

I was thinking that there may be times where you want to skip warnings
to trace real bugs. For example, there's a WARNING that you hit if
your resume takes too long. I may want to skip that warning for the
oops that occurs just after it. As a distro, we also want to be
flexible in our official kernels so we don't have to build special
ones when people hit bugs. It's not as though it would be very
difficult to design with a few priorities, so unless it's really
unnecessary I don't see why we shouldn't. The default would also fire
tracing_off in all cases, so most people wouldn't have to modify it
unless they hit a corner case.

-- Chase
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Chase Douglas, (Fri Mar 12, 8:32 am)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Steven Rostedt, (Fri Mar 12, 4:34 pm)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Chase Douglas, (Fri Mar 12, 7:12 pm)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Steven Rostedt, (Fri Mar 12, 7:30 pm)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Chase Douglas, (Fri Mar 12, 7:50 pm)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Steven Rostedt, (Fri Mar 12, 8:09 pm)
Re: Using tracing_off() in __schedule_bug(), Chase Douglas, (Fri Mar 12, 8:15 pm)