"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:

quoted text
> On 03/11/2010 02:17 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>>
>> Those are all about the first (1/2) patch, not this second patch.
>> Personally, I'm thinking we should apply the first patch as bugfix.
>>
>> I'm talking about only second (2/2) patch in here.
>>
>
> The 2/2 patch seems to be a bug fix too; it implements the intent of the 
> original code as far as I can see.

Yes, however the state is not so sure if compared to first patch. So I
said, if we want, we can drop it (2/2), because it's not so sure to fix
the real problem (bootloader's requirement).

Even if we apply this patch too, it shouldn't introduce new problems
though.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/