login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
March
»
11
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject:
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010 - 7:15 am
* Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text
> > erm. Alas I cannot merge it in the x86 tree without that fix being > > upstream. Why for v2.6.35 - shouldnt that be v2.6.34? > > If it needs to go in before .35, or it should go through Ingo's trees, I > have no objection.
It does not 'need' to be in .34 but if the fix is trivial enough then you could give it a try? Ingo --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Mar 10, 4:42 pm)
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Mar 11, 6:23 am)
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, Greg KH
, (Thu Mar 11, 7:06 am)
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Mar 11, 7:15 am)
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, Greg KH
, (Thu Mar 11, 10:58 am)
Re: [patch] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Mar 11, 11:18 am)
[patch v2] x86: increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, David Rientjes
, (Thu Mar 25, 3:39 pm)
[tip:x86/urgent] x86: Increase CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT max to 10
, tip-bot for David Ri ...
, (Fri Apr 2, 12:06 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Eric Sandeen
Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not pass unused params to xfs_flush_pages
Daniel Hazelton
Re: x86: 4kstacks default
Rusty Russell
Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
Jeffrey V. Merkey
Re: Versioning file system
Matt Mackall
Re: [RFD] Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese
linux-netdev
:
gregkh
Patch "IPv6: keep route for tentative address" has been added to the 2.6.34-stable...
Patrick McHardy
Re: [rfc 02/13] [RFC 02/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Add callid parser
Krzysztof Oledzki
Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".
Paul Gortmaker
[PATCH net-next 09/16] tipc: Relocate trivial link status functions to header file
webmaster Maintenance
&#32852;&#31995;&#31995;&#32479;&#31649;&#29702;&#21592;
git
:
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly
Oliver Kullmann
Re: how to move with history?
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
Andreas Ericsson
Re: why not TortoiseGit
openbsd-misc
:
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Stuart Henderson
Re: Apache Seg Fault after upgrade to 4.6 stable
Úlfar M. E. Johnson
installing openbsd in xen
Brian
CARP multicast and ADSL bridge
Eric Furman
Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Staging: et131x: prune all the debug code
Linux Kernel Mailing List
PCI: introduce pci_pcie_cap()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
USB: g_multi: Multifunction Composite Gadget added
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate