Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Simon Kagstrom
Date: Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 12:45 am

(taking back lkml on CC. The discussion is about stopping watchdogs
before rebooting).

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:10:00 +0000
Pádraig Brady <P@draigBrady.com> wrote:

Well, from the drives I saw that had this behavior (not that I checked
all of them), they did look at nowayout to determine whether to stop it
or not.


Many other drivers use reboot notifiers, but unfortunately it seems
that these are called before device shutdown (kernel/sys.c), so it
wouldn't help here.


I guess it would be good to have defined and uniform behavior across
different watchdogs, and at least an option to specify
nowayout-also-when-rebooting.

// Simon
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout, Simon Kagstrom, (Tue Feb 23, 8:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1d ..., (Tue Feb 23, 9:24 am)
[PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1d ..., (Tue Feb 23, 10:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout, Simon Kagstrom, (Tue Feb 23, 11:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout, Simon Kagstrom, (Wed Feb 24, 2:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout, =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaW ..., (Wed Feb 24, 9:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout, Simon Kagstrom, (Thu Feb 25, 12:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout, Wim Van Sebroeck, (Sun Mar 7, 8:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout, Simon Kagstrom, (Mon Mar 8, 12:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout, =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaW ..., (Wed Apr 7, 9:20 am)