Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jack Steiner
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 - 8:50 pm

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:27:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Sorry - should have included more info from the original posting.
The boot time speedup is the most critical. From the original mail:

	...
	The following experimental patch changes the kernel mapping for ACPI tables
	to CACHED. This eliminates the page attibute conflict & allows users to map
	the tables CACHEABLE. This significantly speeds up boot:

	        38 minutes without the patch
		27 minutes with the patch
		        ~30% improvement
	...

(Since the original posting, we've made additional reductions in
boot times. The absolute improvement from this patch is still the same
but the percentage improvement is now larger).


This is on a large SGI system. Boot time is reduced on smaller systems
but obviously the improvement is much less.

See the original mail for more details.

Len - the original patch had the cached/uncached mapping controlled by a
platform attribute (I'm paranoid). However, the community concensus was
that cached mappings were safe for all platforms.





--- jack
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Thu Jul 22, 8:22 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Len Brown, (Thu Jul 22, 8:52 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, ykzhao, (Thu Jul 22, 6:46 pm)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jul 23, 12:23 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, ykzhao, (Fri Jul 23, 7:26 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Fri Jul 23, 9:38 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Fri Jul 23, 5:14 pm)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Matthew Garrett, (Fri Jul 23, 5:45 pm)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Sat Jul 24, 5:26 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Tue Aug 17, 7:39 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Tue Aug 17, 7:42 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Tue Aug 17, 7:45 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Tue Aug 17, 7:49 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Aug 17, 8:51 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Tue Aug 17, 8:59 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Aug 17, 9:02 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Aug 24, 2:39 pm)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Thu Aug 26, 10:17 am)
Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Len Brown, (Thu Aug 26, 10:47 am)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Aug 26, 11:08 am)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Wed Dec 8, 2:22 pm)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 8, 6:27 pm)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Jack Steiner, (Wed Dec 8, 8:50 pm)
Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED, Len Brown, (Wed Dec 8, 11:12 pm)