On 12/02/2010 11:53 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text > Provide support as far as the hardware capabilities of the x86 cpus
> allow.
>
>
>
> +/*
> + * Beware: xchg on x86 has an implied lock prefix. There will be the cost of
> + * full lock semantics even though they are not needed.
> + */
Perhaps we can use cmpxchg instead of xchg to avoid this? costs one more
instruction but may be worth it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 3/8] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and thi ... , Avi Kivity , (Mon Dec 6, 10:14 am)