Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010 - 5:35 am

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:09:56 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


Yeah, looks like this new Kconfig option depends on some code that's
under the (much-overloaded) CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL Kconfig option. I think
this patch needs some rework. The simple fix would be to make it
dependent on CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL, but that's rather icky since
CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL pulls in some rather broken stuff...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for December 3, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Dec 2, 7:04 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Randy Dunlap, (Fri Dec 3, 10:48 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Dec 6, 12:09 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Jeff Layton, (Mon Dec 6, 5:35 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Shirish Pargaonkar, (Mon Dec 6, 8:40 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Jeff Layton, (Mon Dec 6, 8:50 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 6, 9:43 am)