Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Avery Pennarun
Date: Friday, December 31, 2010 - 3:10 pm

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Yotam Medini <yotam.medini@gmail.com> wrote:

arch/i386 is named arch/x86 nowadays.

It might be interesting to try an older kernel and see if you get
different results.  Since APM is so rare nowadays, I wouldn't be
surprised to find out that the kernel has accumulated some bugs there
in the intervening years.

Avery
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Yotam Medini, (Fri Dec 31, 10:38 am)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Dec 31, 11:33 am)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Yotam Medini, (Fri Dec 31, 12:28 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Dec 31, 12:39 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Yotam Medini, (Fri Dec 31, 2:40 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Avery Pennarun, (Fri Dec 31, 2:54 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Yotam Medini, (Fri Dec 31, 3:05 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Avery Pennarun, (Fri Dec 31, 3:10 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Dec 31, 3:23 pm)
Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat Jan 1, 9:25 am)
Re: CONFIG_APM_POWER - still possible?, Yotam Medini, (Sun Jan 2, 12:16 pm)