Le vendredi 31 décembre 2010 à 10:29 +0100, stefani@seibold.net a
écrit :
quoted text > + if (!list_empty(&usk->destlist)) {
> + state->sk = (struct sock *)usk;
> + state->dest = list_first_entry(&usk->destlist,
> + struct udpcp_dest, list);
> + sock_hold(state->sk);
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&state->sk->sk_refcnt) != 1) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spinlock, flags);
> + return state;
> + }
> + atomic_dec(&state->sk->sk_refcnt);
> + }
> +
I am trying to understand what you are doing here.
It seems racy to me.
Apparently, what you want is to take a reference only if actual
sk_refcnt is not zero.
I suggest using atomic_inc_notzero(&state->sk->sk_refcnt) to avoid the
race in atomic_dec().
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] UDPCP Communication Protocol , Eric Dumazet , (Fri Dec 31, 4:25 am)