Re: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Rientjes
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - 6:07 pm

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:


The two patches above from x86/numa that create the conflict should be 
dependent only on 4e76f4e67a (x86, numa: Avoid compiling NUMA emulation 
functions without CONFIG_NUMA_EMU), so cherry-pick them into x86/bootmem?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Dec 17, 5:58 pm)
[PATCH 0/6] memblock related further cleanup for x86, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:47 pm)
[PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:47 pm)
[PATCH 6/6] x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_*, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Dec 28, 1:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Dec 28, 2:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Dec 28, 3:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Dec 28, 3:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 29, 4:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 29, 4:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local ..., David Rientjes, (Wed Dec 29, 6:07 pm)