Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: James Bottomley
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 - 9:39 am

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:

The latter, I think (and actually, configfs should select sysfs).  All
these unmet dependencies are a minefield.

James


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for December 28, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Dec 27, 11:30 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), Randy Dunlap, (Tue Dec 28, 9:29 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), James Bottomley, (Tue Dec 28, 9:39 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), Randy Dunlap, (Tue Dec 28, 9:50 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), Nicholas A. Bellinger, (Tue Dec 28, 12:38 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), Randy Dunlap, (Tue Dec 28, 1:04 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/), Nicholas A. Bellinger, (Tue Dec 28, 1:13 pm)