Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 - 8:46 am

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 03:59:49PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:


You shouldn't need this any more; the driver used to be faffing around
with this because it wasn't using genirq for this in the past.


Simiarly here as far as I know; the original code predates genirq
support for this so is doing some hairy stuff that is no longer
required and may actually be harmful.

What I'd expect to see from a conversion like this would be that most of
the locking/IRQ management stuff would be dropped and the bus_lock() and
bus_sync_unlock() operations would be implemented.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 6:59 am)
[RFC/PATCH 2/2] mfd: twl4030-irq: move to threaded_irq, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 6:59 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq, Mark Brown, (Tue Dec 28, 8:46 am)
[RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 10:14 am)
[RFC/PATCH 1/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: move to threaded_irq, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 10:14 am)
[RFC/PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: implement bus_*lock, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 10:14 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 10:36 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes, Mark Brown, (Tue Dec 28, 10:41 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes, Felipe Balbi, (Tue Dec 28, 5:39 pm)