Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 5:54 pm

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:15:40 +0100
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:


Things should be done in memory cgroup is
 
 - make accounting correct (RSS count will be broken)
 - make move_charge() to work
   (at rmdir(), this is now broken. It seems move-charge-at-task-move to work)

Do you have known other viewpoints ? I'll look into when -mm is shipped.


Thanks,
-Kame

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Dec 14, 10:15 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Andrew Morton, (Wed Dec 15, 4:55 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Dec 15, 5:54 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Daisuke Nishimura, (Wed Dec 15, 6:10 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Andrew Morton, (Wed Dec 15, 6:18 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Andrea Arcangeli, (Wed Dec 15, 7:13 pm)
kvm mmu transparent hugepage support for linux-next, Andrea Arcangeli, (Wed Dec 15, 7:35 pm)
Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #33, Mel Gorman, (Mon Dec 20, 4:16 am)