login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
December
»
15
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unrelated boosting
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unrelated boosting
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 7:50 am
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > That does not matter. The interesting part is whether the lock on > > which orig_waiter is blocked on was unlocked. Lai's follow up patch does: > > > > + if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock)) > > goto out_unlock_pi; > > > > I haven't looked at his new patch yet. But if this is the case, then we > can nuke all cand_* fields. This was the only reason I kept the > cand_owner in the first place.
Lai nuked it completely. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unrelat ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Tue Dec 14, 2:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Tue Dec 14, 7:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Tue Dec 14, 9:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Tue Dec 14, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Tue Dec 14, 1:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Tue Dec 14, 4:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Tue Dec 14, 7:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Tue Dec 14, 8:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Tue Dec 14, 9:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Tue Dec 14, 9:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 12:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 1:02 am)
[PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher prio ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Wed Dec 15, 1:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 5:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Wed Dec 15, 7:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Wed Dec 15, 8:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Wed Dec 15, 8:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Wed Dec 15, 2:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Wed Dec 15, 6:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Thu Dec 16, 6:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Thu Dec 16, 7:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Darren Hart
, (Thu Dec 16, 1:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Darren Hart
, (Thu Dec 16, 1:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Thu Dec 16, 8:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Thu Dec 16, 8:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Thu Dec 16, 8:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unr ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Thu Dec 23, 12:25 am)
[PATCH V3] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher p ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Thu Dec 23, 1:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Lai Jiangshan
, (Thu Dec 23, 2:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher ...
, Steven Rostedt
, (Thu Dec 23, 5:56 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike
[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood
[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov
Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried
Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev
:
Arnaud Ebalard
Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey
Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder
[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc
:
Joachim Schipper
Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith
Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan
Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate