2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
commit 0e91ec0c06d2cd15071a6021c94840a50e6671aa upstream.
The find_next_bit, find_first_bit, find_next_zero_bit
and find_first_zero_bit functions were not properly
clamping to the maxbit argument at the bit level. They
were instead only checking maxbit at the byte level.
To fix this, add a compare and a conditional move
instruction to the end of the common bit-within-the-
byte code used by all the functions and be sure not to
clobber the maxbit argument before it is used.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/arm/lib/findbit.S | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/arm/lib/findbit.S
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/lib/findbit.S
+++ linux/arch/arm/lib/findbit.S
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ ENDPROC(_find_next_bit_be)
*/
.L_found:
#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 5
- rsb r1, r3, #0
- and r3, r3, r1
+ rsb r0, r3, #0
+ and r3, r3, r0
clz r3, r3
rsb r3, r3, #31
add r0, r2, r3
@@ -190,5 +190,7 @@ ENDPROC(_find_next_bit_be)
addeq r2, r2, #1
mov r0, r2
#endif
+ cmp r1, r0 @ Clamp to maxbit
+ movlo r0, r1
mov pc, lr
--
