Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] genirq: Introduce driver-readable IRQ status word

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010 - 10:29 am

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:


That breaks the current code which has irq_data embedded and shadowed
in irq_desc for migratory reasons until all users are fixed up and the
GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED sections are cleaned up. I know it's
ugly, but that was the only way not to rewrite the world in one go. :)
Just move it below affinity.

Also we should name it different than status, drv_status perhaps, to
avoid confusion with the irq_desc status.


Thanks,

	tglx
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] genirq: Introduce driver-readable IRQ s ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Dec 12, 10:29 am)