Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Rakib Mullick

Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)

Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010 - 12:32 am

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>
> NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if
> CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y.
>
I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from
hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?

thanks,
rakib
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

linux-next: Tree for December 10, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Dec 9, 7:57 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Randy Dunlap, (Fri Dec 10, 10:25 am)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Rakib Mullick, (Sat Dec 11, 10:27 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Rakib Mullick, (Sun Dec 12, 12:32 am)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Don Zickus, (Mon Dec 13, 7:44 am)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Don Zickus, (Mon Dec 13, 8:37 am)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 13, 8:55 am)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10, Zimny Lech, (Mon Dec 13, 12:02 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10, Zimny Lech, (Mon Dec 13, 12:04 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Dec 13, 4:08 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Rakib Mullick, (Mon Dec 13, 10:42 pm)

Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog), Don Zickus, (Tue Dec 14, 8:07 am)


linux-kernel:
Brian Swetland	Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
Robert Marquardt	Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb hid: reset NumLock
Alexandre Oliva	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Uwe Bugla	Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Neil Brown	Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
git:
Felipe Contreras	Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Paolo Ciarrocchi	Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Johannes Schindelin	Re: [PATCH] Fix install-doc-quick target
Peter Oberndorfer	Subject: [PATCH] fix stg edit command
Miklos Vajna	[PATCH 3/3] Fix git update-ref --no-deref -d.
linux-netdev:
Ursula Braun	[patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
Andi Kleen	Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Jarek Poplawski	Re: tc filter flow hash question
David Miller	Re: [RFC 0/5] generic rx recycling
Chuck Lever	Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?
git-commits-head:
Linux Kernel Mailing List	New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List	e1000e: Expose MDI-X status via ethtool change
Linux Kernel Mailing List	NFS: Store pages from an NFS inode into a local cache
Linux Kernel Mailing List	arm/imx/gpio: GPIO_INT_{HIGH,LOW}_LEV are not necessarily constant
Linux Kernel Mailing List	powerpc/kexec: Add support for FSL-BookE
openbsd-misc:
Theo de Raadt	Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879
Bret S. Lambert	Re: any web management gui for pf ?
Rob Shepherd	x86 hardware for router system
Nick Holland	Re: Install OpenBSD from USB ?
Simon Comeau Martel	Activating "ip6.forwarding" and "accept_rtadv" at the same time