Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Mason
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2010 - 7:00 pm

Excerpts from Mike Fedyk's message of 2010-12-09 20:58:40 -0500:

But he is triggering the ext4 corruption without dm-crypt.  I think
dm-crypt was still used somewhere on the system during the test, just
not on the partitions that actually hit the corruption.

-chris
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Sun Nov 14, 2:54 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Sun Nov 14, 4:24 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Heinz Diehl, (Mon Nov 15, 12:25 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Mon Nov 15, 1:41 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Wed Dec 1, 9:05 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Mike Snitzer, (Wed Dec 1, 9:52 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Wed Dec 1, 10:35 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 1, 11:24 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Jon Nelson, (Wed Dec 1, 12:34 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Heinz Diehl, (Wed Dec 1, 12:59 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 1, 1:45 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Milan Broz, (Sun Dec 5, 3:21 am)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Heinz Diehl, (Sun Dec 5, 5:49 am)
Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Daniel J Blueman, (Sun Dec 5, 1:17 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Mike Snitzer, (Sun Dec 5, 2:15 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 8, 1:03 am)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm ..., Chris Mason, (Thu Dec 9, 7:00 pm)