Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010 - 10:10 am

Le lundi 08 novembre 2010 à 08:25 -0800, Nikhil Sethi (निखिल सेठी) a
écrit :


Its very hard to follow this thread, with a message every two months.


As I said, this patch got a min_t() instead of max_t()

http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/8/25/4611322

If you still have kmalloc-8192 allocations, I suspect you dont use right
patch.



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Michael Guntsche, (Fri Jun 4, 2:20 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Michael Guntsche, (Fri Jun 4, 9:16 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Michael Guntsche, (Sun Jun 6, 2:56 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Nikhil Sethi (नि ..., (Wed Aug 25, 1:25 pm)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Nikhil Sethi (नि ..., (Thu Aug 26, 10:53 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Nikhil Sethi (नि ..., (Sun Sep 5, 8:57 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Nikhil Sethi (नि ..., (Mon Nov 8, 9:25 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Nov 8, 10:10 am)
Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020, Nikhil Sethi (नि ..., (Mon Nov 8, 10:22 am)