> Randy, is this one also related to that ipv6 percpu list corruption?
> IOW, does it go away with
>
>
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/69939/
>
> like one of your other reports did?
>
> And David - I think we need that patch merged. The error case for when
> the percpu list entry is free'd without unlinking is _so_ annoying
> (random crashes in totally unrelated code) that I think we need to get
> that one closed asap. Hmm?
