Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Rientjes
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 - 1:05 pm

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:


We have always preferred to break ties between applications by not 
preferring the root task over the user task in the oom killer.  If you'd 
like to remove this bonus for CAP_SYS_ADMIN, please propose a patch.  
Thanks!
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 4:47 pm)
Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 6:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 9, 4:01 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 10, 1:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Figo.zhang, (Sun Nov 14, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 3:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Alan Cox, (Mon Nov 15, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 23, 12:16 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ..., David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 30, 1:05 pm)